|
[Authentify]
[Technology]
Authentication Solutions
Demos |
Technology - The Telephone as an Internet
Defense Mechanism
Upon a time, validating information behind a financial transaction or
payment was easy. Someone from your bank would call you on the phone
at a telephone number they knew belonged to you. If the person calling
was familiar with you, they often recognized your voice and needed no
further assurance that they had reached the right person.
Authentication was provided via a familiar voice behind a telephone
number at which you could be reliably reached. No one ever referred to
a phone call from your banker as an Out-of-Band Authentication, but in
reality, that is the function of the call.
The Public Switched Telephone Network, or PSTN, is one of the most
widely deployed systems of globally unique identifying numbers in
existence. With a few exceptions, the combination of country code,
area code, local exchange and numbers will reliably connect you to a
well-identified location and party. In addition, the PSTN leaves quite
a trail when you use it. After all, phone companies worldwide share a
vested interest in being able to charge one another, and you, for
using their networks.
Viewed in this manner, the telephone network offers considerable
potential for use in remote user authentication schemes, provided the
Internet and Telephone can be used simultaneously. The approach offers
a practical way to manage online payment account enrollment and
provide an additional authentication procedure at the transaction
level. Telephone contact offers direct, out-of-band contact with an
account owner at times when it is beneficial to do so.
Why Is Out-of-Band Authentication Effective?
The Internet and Public Switched Telephone Network, (the PSTN), are
separate networks with their own timestamps, data types and operating
principles. Authentify has harnessed the usefulness of using the two
networks together. The Authentify network synchronization process
provides a means to routinely authenticate a remote online user
relying on their ability to simultaneously control a specific
telephone along with their computer at a particular point in time.
When a user needs to be authenticated for a Web registration or other
transaction, the Web server sends an XML message to Authentify
requesting the telephone call and Web synchronization as a service.
Authentify’s telephony servers, respond to the service request message
received from the Web server and place an automated outbound telephone
call over the PSTN to the online user – while they are still online.
Simultaneously, Authentify’s transaction manager responds with
messages to the Web server invoking a special display. The user will
see information delivered to them via the Internet/Web and will be
required to provide that information to Authentify via the telephone.
This process results in a synchronous, out-of-band exchange that only
the user controlling both the telephone and the computer can complete.
It is worthy to note that this process employs an outbound telephone
call. This is NOT an application of Caller ID based on Automatic
Number Identification often called ANI. (pronounced – “Annie”)
As a simple example, imagine an online user activating an existing
financial account for Internet use. The user attempting to activate
their account will receive a telephone call at a number retrieved from
their existing account records or provided in their enrollment forms.
During the call, the user will be prompted to speak a confirmation
string being displayed on their computer screen. They must speak the
number correctly and be willing to leave a voice recording. At the end
of the enrollment, the financial institution has a strong audit trail
from both the PSTN and the Internet. As both an authentication
technique and a defense mechanism, Out-of-Band Authentication of this
type is particularly effective against the keystroke logging and man
in the middle exploits described above.
A fraudster who has keystroke logged account information, the
man-in-the-middle or even an ‘insider’ or family member can have
access to all the correct account information. They will, however, not
have access to, or not be willing to answer a telephone that belongs
to the legitimate account owner. They recognize this is a good way to
be recognized and caught.
For example, in the case of a phraudster who has logged keystrokes and
attempts to access an account using all the correct information, a
high value payment can trigger a telephone call to the account owner.
The account owner is not involved in the transaction. Simply hanging
up the phone prevents the transaction from being completed.
In the case of the man-in-the-middle exploit, a variation of the
process is very effective. The financial or payment application
requests a phone call to the account owner. The phone call, in
addition to requiring the user to answer the phone, will also repeat
to the user the value of the transaction and perhaps the last few
digits of the destination account. If the account numbers and amounts
have been tampered with by a man-in-the-middle, the legitimate user
will recognize the attempt at tampering and can cancel the
transaction.
|